<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 575 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112068</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that a refund cannot be denied based on limitation grounds when duty was not paid under protest. The decision aligns with the principles established in the Mafatlal Industries Ltd. case, and as no appeal was made by the Revenue, refunds cannot be denied on such grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 14:51:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 575 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112068</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants, stating that a refund cannot be denied based on limitation grounds when duty was not paid under protest. The decision aligns with the principles established in the Mafatlal Industries Ltd. case, and as no appeal was made by the Revenue, refunds cannot be denied on such grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112068</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>