<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 613 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112061</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Official Liquidator&#039;s application seeking to recall orders appointing Advocate Commissioners as liquidators, holding that the Official Liquidator lacked the authority to file such an application independently. The court closed the contempt proceedings against the Official Liquidator with a warning for non-compliance but did not impose any costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 613 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112061</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Official Liquidator&#039;s application seeking to recall orders appointing Advocate Commissioners as liquidators, holding that the Official Liquidator lacked the authority to file such an application independently. The court closed the contempt proceedings against the Official Liquidator with a warning for non-compliance but did not impose any costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>