<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 611 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112057</link>
    <description>The court held that the official liquidator did not have the authority to file the application to recall the order appointing advocate commissioners without prior permission from the company court. The court dismissed the application and closed the contempt proceedings against the official liquidator, accepting the unconditional apology and issuing a warning for future compliance with court directives.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 611 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112057</link>
      <description>The court held that the official liquidator did not have the authority to file the application to recall the order appointing advocate commissioners without prior permission from the company court. The court dismissed the application and closed the contempt proceedings against the official liquidator, accepting the unconditional apology and issuing a warning for future compliance with court directives.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112057</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>