https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112038 The court allowed the appeal, ruling that no fee is required for increasing the authorized share capital of the transferee company in an amalgamation scheme. It held that clause 11.7 should not be deleted or substituted, vacated the interim order for money deposit, and ordered the refund of the deposited amount to the appellant. The scheme was approved without modifications to clause 11.7, in line with previous High Court decisions. en-us Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112038 The court allowed the appeal, ruling that no fee is required for increasing the authorized share capital of the transferee company in an amalgamation scheme. It held that clause 11.7 should not be deleted or substituted, vacated the interim order for money deposit, and ordered the refund of the deposited amount to the appellant. The scheme was approved without modifications to clause 11.7, in line with previous High Court decisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112038