<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (7) TMI 391 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112033</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the orders imposing a redemption fine and penalty for misdeclaration of goods were set aside. The dispute over the classification of goods under specific entries was deemed irrelevant as the goods were cleared for home consumption under a different heading.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 13:19:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (7) TMI 391 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112033</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the orders imposing a redemption fine and penalty for misdeclaration of goods were set aside. The dispute over the classification of goods under specific entries was deemed irrelevant as the goods were cleared for home consumption under a different heading.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>