<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 282 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112024</link>
    <description>The High Court of Calcutta sanctioned a proposed scheme of arrangement between three petitioner-companies, subject to conditions and undertakings. The court ordered the transfer of properties, rights, and powers of two petitioner-companies to a specific company. Debts, liabilities, duties, and obligations of the petitioner-companies were directed to be transferred to the specific company. All pending legal proceedings were to be continued by or against the specific company. The petitioner-companies were granted permission to file their schedule of assets, and were required to deliver certified copies of the court order for registration. An objection regarding the issuance of shares was dismissed, and the petitioner companies were directed to pay costs related to the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149040" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 282 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112024</link>
      <description>The High Court of Calcutta sanctioned a proposed scheme of arrangement between three petitioner-companies, subject to conditions and undertakings. The court ordered the transfer of properties, rights, and powers of two petitioner-companies to a specific company. Debts, liabilities, duties, and obligations of the petitioner-companies were directed to be transferred to the specific company. All pending legal proceedings were to be continued by or against the specific company. The petitioner-companies were granted permission to file their schedule of assets, and were required to deliver certified copies of the court order for registration. An objection regarding the issuance of shares was dismissed, and the petitioner companies were directed to pay costs related to the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112024</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>