https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112012 A request to transfer the appeal to the Mumbai Bench was rejected because a mere change of counsel and asserted convenience were not sufficient grounds. The matter's stage, the absence of any earlier transfer request, and the fact that several connected appeals were already being handled by the same Bench weighed against transfer. The age of the matter was also considered, but it did not justify relocation of the appeal. en-us Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:43:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112012 A request to transfer the appeal to the Mumbai Bench was rejected because a mere change of counsel and asserted convenience were not sufficient grounds. The matter's stage, the absence of any earlier transfer request, and the fact that several connected appeals were already being handled by the same Bench weighed against transfer. The age of the matter was also considered, but it did not justify relocation of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112012