https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112011 Contradictory appellate orders arising from the same original order justified interim protection, as the Tribunal found the later impugned order prima facie inconsistent with an earlier appellate order that had already set aside the penalty under Section 11AC. On the material placed, the appellant showed sufficient merit to seek protection against recovery. The stay application was therefore allowed, pre-deposit was waived, and operation of the impugned order was stayed. en-us Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:32:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112011 Contradictory appellate orders arising from the same original order justified interim protection, as the Tribunal found the later impugned order prima facie inconsistent with an earlier appellate order that had already set aside the penalty under Section 11AC. On the material placed, the appellant showed sufficient merit to seek protection against recovery. The stay application was therefore allowed, pre-deposit was waived, and operation of the impugned order was stayed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112011