<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112005</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted pending appeal where the Tribunal found the appellants&#039; documentary record, existing bond and bank guarantee, and notification-based claim on re-imported goods sufficient to justify interim relief at the stay stage. The relief was not unconditional: recovery remained stayed only subject to renewal of the bank guarantee until disposal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 389 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112005</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery were granted pending appeal where the Tribunal found the appellants&#039; documentary record, existing bond and bank guarantee, and notification-based claim on re-imported goods sufficient to justify interim relief at the stay stage. The relief was not unconditional: recovery remained stayed only subject to renewal of the bank guarantee until disposal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>