<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112002</link>
    <description>The court approved the scheme of arrangement for amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, involving three petitioner-companies in the realty sector. The amalgamation aimed to consolidate operations, benefit from economies of scale, streamline administration, enhance financial strength, and gain a competitive edge. After reviewing the petitions and submissions, the court found the scheme to be in the interest of the companies, members, and creditors. The prayers in the petitions were granted, and costs to the Central Government standing counsel were quantified and directed to be paid accordingly, concluding the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149018" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112002</link>
      <description>The court approved the scheme of arrangement for amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, involving three petitioner-companies in the realty sector. The amalgamation aimed to consolidate operations, benefit from economies of scale, streamline administration, enhance financial strength, and gain a competitive edge. After reviewing the petitions and submissions, the court found the scheme to be in the interest of the companies, members, and creditors. The prayers in the petitions were granted, and costs to the Central Government standing counsel were quantified and directed to be paid accordingly, concluding the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=112002</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>