<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 384 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for deduction of equalised freight in depot sales, emphasizing the distinction between factory gate and depot sales assessments. The matter was remanded for detailed examination by the original authority, ensuring a fair assessment based on the observations made by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:58:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 384 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s claim for deduction of equalised freight in depot sales, emphasizing the distinction between factory gate and depot sales assessments. The matter was remanded for detailed examination by the original authority, ensuring a fair assessment based on the observations made by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>