<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (11) TMI 407 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111989</link>
    <description>In winding-up proceedings, if a compromise petition is placed before the Court, it must either be accepted and incorporated into the final order or rejected for valid reasons before the petition is decided on merits. The Court held that this procedural requirement was not followed, as the winding-up petition was dismissed without first dealing with the compromise. The larger question whether winding up was otherwise justified was not examined. The dismissal was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law, after addressing the compromise petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=149005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (11) TMI 407 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111989</link>
      <description>In winding-up proceedings, if a compromise petition is placed before the Court, it must either be accepted and incorporated into the final order or rejected for valid reasons before the petition is decided on merits. The Court held that this procedural requirement was not followed, as the winding-up petition was dismissed without first dealing with the compromise. The larger question whether winding up was otherwise justified was not examined. The dismissal was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for fresh consideration in accordance with law, after addressing the compromise petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>