https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111974 The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the court emphasizing the availability of remedies under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner was directed to pursue legal remedies through the Company Law Board, highlighting the discretionary power of the Central Government under section 237 of the Act. The court found that the writ petition was not maintainable and granted the petitioner the liberty to seek appropriate redress through the prescribed legal channels. en-us Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Dec 2014 13:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111974 The Writ Petition was disposed of, with the court emphasizing the availability of remedies under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner was directed to pursue legal remedies through the Company Law Board, highlighting the discretionary power of the Central Government under section 237 of the Act. The court found that the writ petition was not maintainable and granted the petitioner the liberty to seek appropriate redress through the prescribed legal channels. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 29 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111974