<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 398 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111961</link>
    <description>The court granted the petitioner&#039;s winding up petition under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to the respondent-company&#039;s failure to pay Rs. 3,68,29,634.91 despite statutory notice. The respondent&#039;s resistance was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the court&#039;s decision to grant the winding up order with a two-month settlement window for the respondent to comply, failing which the order would take immediate effect.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 10:30:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148977" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 398 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111961</link>
      <description>The court granted the petitioner&#039;s winding up petition under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to the respondent-company&#039;s failure to pay Rs. 3,68,29,634.91 despite statutory notice. The respondent&#039;s resistance was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the court&#039;s decision to grant the winding up order with a two-month settlement window for the respondent to comply, failing which the order would take immediate effect.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111961</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>