<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 556 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111950</link>
    <description>A court-supervised receivership was held unwarranted where the club was functioning smoothly under its present managing committee and no sufficient basis existed for judicial takeover. On registration, the club&#039;s sports object brought it within the category of societies capable of registration under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, but the statutory scheme did not compel registration where the object was promotion of athletics or sports. The matter of registration was required to be placed before the competent general body, and an extraordinary general body meeting was directed so members could decide the route for registration and implementation thereafter. Challenges to voting rights were left to be raised in appropriate proceedings against the bye-laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 15:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 556 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111950</link>
      <description>A court-supervised receivership was held unwarranted where the club was functioning smoothly under its present managing committee and no sufficient basis existed for judicial takeover. On registration, the club&#039;s sports object brought it within the category of societies capable of registration under the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, but the statutory scheme did not compel registration where the object was promotion of athletics or sports. The matter of registration was required to be placed before the competent general body, and an extraordinary general body meeting was directed so members could decide the route for registration and implementation thereafter. Challenges to voting rights were left to be raised in appropriate proceedings against the bye-laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>