<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 399 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111946</link>
    <description>An appeal challenging an order on the supposed inconsistency of an unidentified Board circular with the statutory rules was held unsustainable because the circular was neither filed nor identified on record. The challenge proceeded on bare assertion without the material necessary for examination, showing a lack of due application of mind. In those circumstances, the proceeding was treated as frivolous and the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:45:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 399 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111946</link>
      <description>An appeal challenging an order on the supposed inconsistency of an unidentified Board circular with the statutory rules was held unsustainable because the circular was neither filed nor identified on record. The challenge proceeded on bare assertion without the material necessary for examination, showing a lack of due application of mind. In those circumstances, the proceeding was treated as frivolous and the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>