https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111942 A 42-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the appellants showed a bona fide belief that a co-appellant's timely appeal against the same common order would cover their grounds. Once they realised a separate appeal was required, they filed promptly and explained the delay as a genuine mistake. The Tribunal treated this explanation as sufficient cause, allowed the condonation application, and directed that the appeal be taken up for regular hearing. en-us Mon, 24 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:42:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111942 A 42-day delay in filing the appeal was condoned because the appellants showed a bona fide belief that a co-appellant's timely appeal against the same common order would cover their grounds. Once they realised a separate appeal was required, they filed promptly and explained the delay as a genuine mistake. The Tribunal treated this explanation as sufficient cause, allowed the condonation application, and directed that the appeal be taken up for regular hearing. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111942