<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 395 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111941</link>
    <description>Recovery of proportionate duty or an 8% amount under Rule 57CC(9) for inputs used in exempted goods was held unsustainable for the relevant period because no machinery provision existed to authorise such recovery. The Tribunal noted that, in the absence of an enabling recovery mechanism in the rule as applicable during the dispute period, the demand could not be enforced. Relying on earlier decisions on the same point, it concluded that the demand was not legally recoverable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:41:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 395 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111941</link>
      <description>Recovery of proportionate duty or an 8% amount under Rule 57CC(9) for inputs used in exempted goods was held unsustainable for the relevant period because no machinery provision existed to authorise such recovery. The Tribunal noted that, in the absence of an enabling recovery mechanism in the rule as applicable during the dispute period, the demand could not be enforced. Relying on earlier decisions on the same point, it concluded that the demand was not legally recoverable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>