<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 552 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111939</link>
    <description>The Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, finding it beneficial for the companies involved without prejudicing creditors, shareholders, or the public. The order allowed the company petitions related to the amalgamation and specified costs to be paid to the Central Government Counsel, while clarifying that the sanction would not hinder any criminal prosecution or legal proceedings against the transferee companies or their directors for past actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2014 14:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 552 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111939</link>
      <description>The Court sanctioned the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, finding it beneficial for the companies involved without prejudicing creditors, shareholders, or the public. The order allowed the company petitions related to the amalgamation and specified costs to be paid to the Central Government Counsel, while clarifying that the sanction would not hinder any criminal prosecution or legal proceedings against the transferee companies or their directors for past actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>