<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 551 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111936</link>
    <description>Articles of Association governing cessation and restoration of company membership were interpreted to permit restoration upon payment of outstanding subscriptions. Membership had been treated as ceased for non-payment, while the company relied on a sub-committee process and asserted discretion to refuse readmission. The court found no basis to delay decisions on restoration and required fair, unbiased treatment. Alleged inaccuracies concerning payment dates were not determinative because compliance with the Articles governed restoration. Despite drafting inconsistencies between the substantive and interim relief sought, interim restoration was granted upon payment of dues, enabling exercise of membership rights and participation in elections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2014 09:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 551 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111936</link>
      <description>Articles of Association governing cessation and restoration of company membership were interpreted to permit restoration upon payment of outstanding subscriptions. Membership had been treated as ceased for non-payment, while the company relied on a sub-committee process and asserted discretion to refuse readmission. The court found no basis to delay decisions on restoration and required fair, unbiased treatment. Alleged inaccuracies concerning payment dates were not determinative because compliance with the Articles governed restoration. Despite drafting inconsistencies between the substantive and interim relief sought, interim restoration was granted upon payment of dues, enabling exercise of membership rights and participation in elections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>