<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 387 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111930</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a duty amount of Rs. 1,04,065.76 against the appellant for the period from July 1998 to November 1998, along with a personal penalty of Rs. 1,000. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of clearances at concessional rates for the disputed period, with clearances made before 2-6-98 being considered after computing the Rs. 50 lakhs clearance value. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for reconsideration by the original Adjudicating Authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 387 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111930</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal confirmed a duty amount of Rs. 1,04,065.76 against the appellant for the period from July 1998 to November 1998, along with a personal penalty of Rs. 1,000. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to the benefit of clearances at concessional rates for the disputed period, with clearances made before 2-6-98 being considered after computing the Rs. 50 lakhs clearance value. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter for reconsideration by the original Adjudicating Authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111930</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>