<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 409 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111921</link>
    <description>The judgment focused on condonation of delay in filing appeals, where explanations for the delay were deemed unconvincing but ultimately accepted for justice. The Tribunal allowed the condonation applications and adjourned the remaining applications for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery to a future date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:03:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 409 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111921</link>
      <description>The judgment focused on condonation of delay in filing appeals, where explanations for the delay were deemed unconvincing but ultimately accepted for justice. The Tribunal allowed the condonation applications and adjourned the remaining applications for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery to a future date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>