<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 557 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111910</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court allowed the condonation of delays ranging from 650 to 998 days in filing appeals before the Securities Appellate Tribunal. In each case, the appellant was required to pay a specified sum as cost to the respondent within a set time frame. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the impugned order. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting this condition to justify the condonation of delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 557 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111910</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court allowed the condonation of delays ranging from 650 to 998 days in filing appeals before the Securities Appellate Tribunal. In each case, the appellant was required to pay a specified sum as cost to the respondent within a set time frame. Failure to comply would lead to dismissal of the appeal and affirmation of the impugned order. The Court emphasized the importance of meeting this condition to justify the condonation of delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>