<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 577 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111901</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the winding up petition under sections 433, 434, and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to a bona fide dispute over outstanding dues between the parties. The court considered the familial relationships between shareholders and directors, emphasizing the need for genuine disputes to justify a winding up order and prevent misuse of the Companies Act provisions for coercive purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 15:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 577 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111901</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the winding up petition under sections 433, 434, and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, due to a bona fide dispute over outstanding dues between the parties. The court considered the familial relationships between shareholders and directors, emphasizing the need for genuine disputes to justify a winding up order and prevent misuse of the Companies Act provisions for coercive purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>