<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 526 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111896</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Adjudicating Authority regarding the classification of Polyester Fabrics, rejecting the reliance on the Textile Commissioner&#039;s report and confirming differential duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of considering credible certifying institutions like SASMIRA and found the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision unsustainable due to two favorable test reports and past import history supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 17:22:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148912" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 526 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111896</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the decision of the Adjudicating Authority regarding the classification of Polyester Fabrics, rejecting the reliance on the Textile Commissioner&#039;s report and confirming differential duty, confiscation of goods, and penalties. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of considering credible certifying institutions like SASMIRA and found the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision unsustainable due to two favorable test reports and past import history supporting the appellant&#039;s claim. Consequently, the impugned order was overturned, and both appeals were allowed in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>