<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 535 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111881</link>
    <description>Once a manufacturer opts for a small-scale exemption notification, the benefit cannot be denied for the same financial year merely because some clearances were made at full duty by mistake. The excess duty paid on those clearances had been refunded, and that factual position did not justify withdrawal of the exemption. The notification&#039;s condition prohibited withdrawal from its operation during the year, not denial of relief because of an inadvertent payment at the normal rate. The exemption was therefore held available for the relevant financial year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:51:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148897" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 535 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111881</link>
      <description>Once a manufacturer opts for a small-scale exemption notification, the benefit cannot be denied for the same financial year merely because some clearances were made at full duty by mistake. The excess duty paid on those clearances had been refunded, and that factual position did not justify withdrawal of the exemption. The notification&#039;s condition prohibited withdrawal from its operation during the year, not denial of relief because of an inadvertent payment at the normal rate. The exemption was therefore held available for the relevant financial year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>