<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (1) TMI 534 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111880</link>
    <description>Small-scale exemption is available only on the value of excisable goods manufactured by the assessee, so traded goods cannot be added to the turnover of the manufacturing unit merely because they bear the same brand name. Units are not to be clubbed without a proper evidentiary basis showing dummy operations or a sustained clubbing finding, and the brand-name restriction does not automatically defeat exemption on those facts. On valuation, depot-sale price cannot be adopted without a proper factual foundation; the assessable value must be reconsidered where factory-gate sales, related-person allegations, and limitation issues remain unsettled. The valuation issue therefore requires fresh examination on evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:45:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (1) TMI 534 - CESTAT, new delhi</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111880</link>
      <description>Small-scale exemption is available only on the value of excisable goods manufactured by the assessee, so traded goods cannot be added to the turnover of the manufacturing unit merely because they bear the same brand name. Units are not to be clubbed without a proper evidentiary basis showing dummy operations or a sustained clubbing finding, and the brand-name restriction does not automatically defeat exemption on those facts. On valuation, depot-sale price cannot be adopted without a proper factual foundation; the assessable value must be reconsidered where factory-gate sales, related-person allegations, and limitation issues remain unsettled. The valuation issue therefore requires fresh examination on evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>