https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111877 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 applies to wrongful retention of company property after cessation of employment, even where the occupant asserts a tenancy claim, if the premises were allotted by virtue of service and the evidence does not establish any independent contractual right. The conviction and direction to vacate the company quarters were upheld. A complaint may also be instituted through a duly authorised power of attorney holder where company authorisation and records show specific authority to prosecute proceedings, and the absence of personal filing by a director does not invalidate the complaint. The revisions therefore failed, subject to time granted for compliance with eviction. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Dec 2014 16:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111877 Section 630 of the Companies Act, 1956 applies to wrongful retention of company property after cessation of employment, even where the occupant asserts a tenancy claim, if the premises were allotted by virtue of service and the evidence does not establish any independent contractual right. The conviction and direction to vacate the company quarters were upheld. A complaint may also be instituted through a duly authorised power of attorney holder where company authorisation and records show specific authority to prosecute proceedings, and the absence of personal filing by a director does not invalidate the complaint. The revisions therefore failed, subject to time granted for compliance with eviction. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111877