<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 425 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111860</link>
    <description>The court held that Section 391(6) of the Companies Act does not authorize the company court to stay criminal proceedings against the company or its directors. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must proceed independently of any restructuring scheme approved under the Companies Act. The order staying the criminal proceedings was overturned, and the appeal was successful with costs awarded to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:56:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 425 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111860</link>
      <description>The court held that Section 391(6) of the Companies Act does not authorize the company court to stay criminal proceedings against the company or its directors. Criminal proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act must proceed independently of any restructuring scheme approved under the Companies Act. The order staying the criminal proceedings was overturned, and the appeal was successful with costs awarded to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>