<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (6) TMI 353 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111855</link>
    <description>Cut wrappers cleared in rolls, rather than as individual containers, and not cut to shape and size were held classifiable under Heading 4823.90. The classification turned on the physical form of clearance and the Board&#039;s circular relied on in the order. On that factual basis, the goods were not classifiable under Heading 4823.19, and the classification was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:40:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (6) TMI 353 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111855</link>
      <description>Cut wrappers cleared in rolls, rather than as individual containers, and not cut to shape and size were held classifiable under Heading 4823.90. The classification turned on the physical form of clearance and the Board&#039;s circular relied on in the order. On that factual basis, the goods were not classifiable under Heading 4823.19, and the classification was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>