<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111834</link>
    <description>The appeal against the winding up order passed against JMD Medicare Limited under the Companies Act, 1956 was dismissed. The Company Judge found the company unable to pay its debts and upheld the petitioning creditor&#039;s claim. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments of a bona fide dispute and counter-claim, the court supported the winding up order due to the company&#039;s failure to meet dues for four years and its financial constraints. The court highlighted the equitable nature of winding up petitions for undisputed debts and affirmed the original decision, emphasizing the necessity of enforcing payment of just debts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 12:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 413 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111834</link>
      <description>The appeal against the winding up order passed against JMD Medicare Limited under the Companies Act, 1956 was dismissed. The Company Judge found the company unable to pay its debts and upheld the petitioning creditor&#039;s claim. Despite the appellant&#039;s arguments of a bona fide dispute and counter-claim, the court supported the winding up order due to the company&#039;s failure to meet dues for four years and its financial constraints. The court highlighted the equitable nature of winding up petitions for undisputed debts and affirmed the original decision, emphasizing the necessity of enforcing payment of just debts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>