<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 404 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111808</link>
    <description>The Court sanctioned the proposed scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, involving &#039;M/s. Nishraj Traders (P.) Ltd.&#039; and &#039;M/s Madhu Viniyog (P.) Ltd.&#039; The scheme aimed to consolidate assets and resources for operational efficiencies, with a fair share exchange ratio based on a valuation report. The Court found no legal impediment to approving the scheme, directing the transferee-company to deposit costs and file a certified copy with the Registrar of Companies. Upon sanction, the transferor-company would dissolve without winding up, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 14:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 404 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111808</link>
      <description>The Court sanctioned the proposed scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, involving &#039;M/s. Nishraj Traders (P.) Ltd.&#039; and &#039;M/s Madhu Viniyog (P.) Ltd.&#039; The scheme aimed to consolidate assets and resources for operational efficiencies, with a fair share exchange ratio based on a valuation report. The Court found no legal impediment to approving the scheme, directing the transferee-company to deposit costs and file a certified copy with the Registrar of Companies. Upon sanction, the transferor-company would dissolve without winding up, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>