<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (5) TMI 403 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111807</link>
    <description>The company, represented by Petitioner No. 1, sought restoration of its name in the register under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Registrar of Companies did not object to the restoration, subject to payment of additional fees for filing statutory returns. The court directed the Registrar to restore the company&#039;s name in the register upon payment of the determined additional fee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:06:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148823" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (5) TMI 403 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111807</link>
      <description>The company, represented by Petitioner No. 1, sought restoration of its name in the register under section 560(6) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Registrar of Companies did not object to the restoration, subject to payment of additional fees for filing statutory returns. The court directed the Registrar to restore the company&#039;s name in the register upon payment of the determined additional fee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>