<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 507 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111787</link>
    <description>The Court approved the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between the transferor and transferee companies. Exemption from convening statutory meetings was granted due to prior shareholder consent. Despite opposition from an ex-workman over alleged dues, the Court accepted the scheme after the transferor company demonstrated a bona fide dispute and deposited the disputed amount. The amalgamation aimed to enhance efficiency, eliminate redundancies, and benefit stakeholders. The Court sanctioned the scheme, directing the transferor company to deposit costs and clarifying stamp duty obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148803" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 507 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111787</link>
      <description>The Court approved the scheme of amalgamation under sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, between the transferor and transferee companies. Exemption from convening statutory meetings was granted due to prior shareholder consent. Despite opposition from an ex-workman over alleged dues, the Court accepted the scheme after the transferor company demonstrated a bona fide dispute and deposited the disputed amount. The amalgamation aimed to enhance efficiency, eliminate redundancies, and benefit stakeholders. The Court sanctioned the scheme, directing the transferor company to deposit costs and clarifying stamp duty obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111787</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>