<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 346 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111767</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh orders on the modification application. The appellants were granted the opportunity to be heard, emphasizing the importance of due process in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:01:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148783" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 346 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111767</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh orders on the modification application. The appellants were granted the opportunity to be heard, emphasizing the importance of due process in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>