<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 475 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111752</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the subsidiary company had bona fide disputed the debt claimed by Walnut. The court also found no basis to hold the holding company liable for the subsidiary&#039;s debt, as there was no evidence of fraud or improper conduct warranting the lifting of the corporate veil.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2014 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 475 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111752</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the company petition as the subsidiary company had bona fide disputed the debt claimed by Walnut. The court also found no basis to hold the holding company liable for the subsidiary&#039;s debt, as there was no evidence of fraud or improper conduct warranting the lifting of the corporate veil.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>