https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111743 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai classified medicaments labeled as 'Intercid' and 'Jecid' under heading 3003.10 instead of 3003.20. The tribunal ruled that since the terms were not proven to be used in pharmacopoeias, they did not qualify as 'brand names' under chapter note 2 to chapter 30. This decision overturned the lower authority's classification, emphasizing the need to adhere to specific criteria outlined in legal provisions for accurate classification. en-us Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:42:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111743 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai classified medicaments labeled as 'Intercid' and 'Jecid' under heading 3003.10 instead of 3003.20. The tribunal ruled that since the terms were not proven to be used in pharmacopoeias, they did not qualify as 'brand names' under chapter note 2 to chapter 30. This decision overturned the lower authority's classification, emphasizing the need to adhere to specific criteria outlined in legal provisions for accurate classification. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111743