<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (5) TMI 336 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to premises seizure by KSFC, citing the appellant&#039;s lack of diligence, failure to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay, and history of adjournments. Despite the challenging circumstances, including the unavailability of records inside the industrial shed, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with appeal filing requirements. The appellant&#039;s negligence and insufficient justification for the delay resulted in the rejection of the condonation application and the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148758" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (5) TMI 336 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the condonation of delay in filing an appeal due to premises seizure by KSFC, citing the appellant&#039;s lack of diligence, failure to provide a satisfactory explanation for the delay, and history of adjournments. Despite the challenging circumstances, including the unavailability of records inside the industrial shed, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with appeal filing requirements. The appellant&#039;s negligence and insufficient justification for the delay resulted in the rejection of the condonation application and the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>