https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111737 The court dismissed the winding up petition due to lack of substance in the objection regarding service of notice of demand, as it was sent to the registered office and not denied by the respondent. The person filing the petition was a director of the petitioner-company with no objection to his authorization. Disputed dues for supplies were contested, with the court finding it implausible that the supplies were returned. It concluded that winding up proceedings were not suitable for resolving disputed dues and advised seeking alternative remedies. en-us Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Apr 2012 10:30:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111737 The court dismissed the winding up petition due to lack of substance in the objection regarding service of notice of demand, as it was sent to the registered office and not denied by the respondent. The person filing the petition was a director of the petitioner-company with no objection to his authorization. Disputed dues for supplies were contested, with the court finding it implausible that the supplies were returned. It concluded that winding up proceedings were not suitable for resolving disputed dues and advised seeking alternative remedies. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Nov 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111737