https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111707 The court upheld the decision directing Peerless to register the shares in favor of Project, affirming that Peerless's refusal was unjustified. The plea of limitation and the application of section 5 of the Limitation Act were deemed unnecessary. The appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs. en-us Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:57:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111707 The court upheld the decision directing Peerless to register the shares in favor of Project, affirming that Peerless's refusal was unjustified. The plea of limitation and the application of section 5 of the Limitation Act were deemed unnecessary. The appeal was disposed of without any order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 02 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111707