https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111700 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that vulcanized rubber sheets bonded to metallic surfaces of equipment are not excisable. The decision was based on the non-marketability of the bonded rubber lining and precedent involving in situ formation of materials, as established in a previous Supreme Court ruling. The appellant's argument regarding the separability of the rubber lining was rejected due to strong bonding post-vulcanization, supported by the Tribunal's findings and lack of substantiation from the appellant on the applicability of a different court decision. en-us Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:43:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111700 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, affirming that vulcanized rubber sheets bonded to metallic surfaces of equipment are not excisable. The decision was based on the non-marketability of the bonded rubber lining and precedent involving in situ formation of materials, as established in a previous Supreme Court ruling. The appellant's argument regarding the separability of the rubber lining was rejected due to strong bonding post-vulcanization, supported by the Tribunal's findings and lack of substantiation from the appellant on the applicability of a different court decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111700