<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 563 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111670</link>
    <description>Fuel oil recovered from ship-breaking was treated as assessable under Chapter 27 rather than Heading 89.08 because the claim depended on proof that the oil was in the ship&#039;s engine room tank as part of the vessel, and no such evidence was produced. On that basis, the appellants failed to show a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, so the request for waiver was rejected and the appeal was found to have no merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:21:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148686" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 563 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111670</link>
      <description>Fuel oil recovered from ship-breaking was treated as assessable under Chapter 27 rather than Heading 89.08 because the claim depended on proof that the oil was in the ship&#039;s engine room tank as part of the vessel, and no such evidence was produced. On that basis, the appellants failed to show a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit, so the request for waiver was rejected and the appeal was found to have no merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>