<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 561 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal stayed the operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order, indicating a preliminary inclination towards the Revenue&#039;s argument that altering the price of the imported vessel after entry into India is impermissible. The case highlights the significance of determining the value of goods at the time of importation for customs duty assessment, emphasizing adherence to established precedents and customs regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:17:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148679" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 561 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal stayed the operation of the Commissioner (Appeals) order, indicating a preliminary inclination towards the Revenue&#039;s argument that altering the price of the imported vessel after entry into India is impermissible. The case highlights the significance of determining the value of goods at the time of importation for customs duty assessment, emphasizing adherence to established precedents and customs regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>