<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 553 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111655</link>
    <description>Photo cells used as detectors in spectrophotometers were treated as non-photovoltaic because they generated an electrical signal from incident light rather than converting light directly into electrical energy. On that basis, they were covered by the open general licence and not liable to confiscation as photovoltaic cells. The same functional distinction also displaced Heading 85.41 under the Customs Tariff Act, which applied to photovoltaic cells, and supported classification under Heading 90.27 for the imported detector goods. The commentary states that the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty did not survive once the import-control and tariff classification issues were resolved in favour of the importers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:45:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148671" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 553 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111655</link>
      <description>Photo cells used as detectors in spectrophotometers were treated as non-photovoltaic because they generated an electrical signal from incident light rather than converting light directly into electrical energy. On that basis, they were covered by the open general licence and not liable to confiscation as photovoltaic cells. The same functional distinction also displaced Heading 85.41 under the Customs Tariff Act, which applied to photovoltaic cells, and supported classification under Heading 90.27 for the imported detector goods. The commentary states that the confiscation, redemption fine and penalty did not survive once the import-control and tariff classification issues were resolved in favour of the importers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>