https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111651 The Court held that penal provisions under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act are not barred by a winding-up order and are additional to the mode of recovery under Section 25. The State Commission's conversion of the appeal into a revision petition without justification deprived the petitioner of the right to challenge the order before the National Commission. The writ petition was dismissed, clarifying the State Commission's powers under Sections 15 and 17(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, with acknowledgment of the amicus curiae's efforts. en-us Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:21:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111651 The Court held that penal provisions under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act are not barred by a winding-up order and are additional to the mode of recovery under Section 25. The State Commission's conversion of the appeal into a revision petition without justification deprived the petitioner of the right to challenge the order before the National Commission. The writ petition was dismissed, clarifying the State Commission's powers under Sections 15 and 17(1)(b) of the Consumer Protection Act, with acknowledgment of the amicus curiae's efforts. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 28 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111651