<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 550 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111645</link>
    <description>Customs House Agents licence renewal may be refused where the licensing authority is empowered to prescribe renewal norms and the licensee fails to meet them even after an additional opportunity. The Tribunal found that the appellant had already received an ex gratia renewal and further chance, yet did not satisfy the parameters in the public notice. On those facts, a further indulgence was not warranted, and the cited precedent was distinguished as turning on different circumstances. Refusal to renew the licence was therefore justified and the challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:52:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148661" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 550 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111645</link>
      <description>Customs House Agents licence renewal may be refused where the licensing authority is empowered to prescribe renewal norms and the licensee fails to meet them even after an additional opportunity. The Tribunal found that the appellant had already received an ex gratia renewal and further chance, yet did not satisfy the parameters in the public notice. On those facts, a further indulgence was not warranted, and the cited precedent was distinguished as turning on different circumstances. Refusal to renew the licence was therefore justified and the challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111645</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>