https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111638 The 1993 recovery regime vests adjudication of liability and execution in the Debts Recovery Tribunal and Recovery Officer, and overrides inconsistent company-law provisions. The High Court also recognised that its constitutional jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 remains available, and that a Company Judge dealing with winding-up matters under section 446 may invoke that jurisdiction. On that basis, the Official Liquidator's challenge to the auction order was treated as maintainable, and the Recovery Officer's auction order was kept stayed until disposal of the connected Supreme Court matter. en-us Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:44:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111638 The 1993 recovery regime vests adjudication of liability and execution in the Debts Recovery Tribunal and Recovery Officer, and overrides inconsistent company-law provisions. The High Court also recognised that its constitutional jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 remains available, and that a Company Judge dealing with winding-up matters under section 446 may invoke that jurisdiction. On that basis, the Official Liquidator's challenge to the auction order was treated as maintainable, and the Recovery Officer's auction order was kept stayed until disposal of the connected Supreme Court matter. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 31 Jul 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111638