https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111596 The Tribunal recalled an order imposing a deposit condition for adjournment in appeals, following applications filed by the appellants. Despite discrepancies in the Senior Counsel's absence, the Tribunal accepted her submissions and determined it had the inherent power to recall the order under Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Emphasizing the order was an adjournment with a deposit condition to prevent abuse of process, the Tribunal found the condition prejudicial to the appellants and recalled the order dated 19-4-2004. Consequently, the appeals were adjourned to a later date. en-us Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:29:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111596 The Tribunal recalled an order imposing a deposit condition for adjournment in appeals, following applications filed by the appellants. Despite discrepancies in the Senior Counsel's absence, the Tribunal accepted her submissions and determined it had the inherent power to recall the order under Rule 41 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. Emphasizing the order was an adjournment with a deposit condition to prevent abuse of process, the Tribunal found the condition prejudicial to the appellants and recalled the order dated 19-4-2004. Consequently, the appeals were adjourned to a later date. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 26 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111596