https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111570 The Court dismissed the application seeking direction to hand over agricultural land and payment of damages in Company Petition No. 4/95. It was held that the disputed factual questions fell outside the Court's jurisdiction under section 456 of the Companies Act. The Court suggested that the applicant should seek resolution from the District Magistrate, Sikar, under sub-section (1A) of section 456 of the Companies Act. The application was therefore dismissed with these observations. en-us Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:28:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111570 The Court dismissed the application seeking direction to hand over agricultural land and payment of damages in Company Petition No. 4/95. It was held that the disputed factual questions fell outside the Court's jurisdiction under section 456 of the Companies Act. The Court suggested that the applicant should seek resolution from the District Magistrate, Sikar, under sub-section (1A) of section 456 of the Companies Act. The application was therefore dismissed with these observations. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111570