<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (3) TMI 338 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111552</link>
    <description>The court approved the scheme of reconstruction, arrangement, and demerger between the transferor and transferee companies under sections 391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court addressed objections raised, clarified procedural aspects, and confirmed that modifications to the scheme were technical and did not alter the original intent significantly. Sanction was granted, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:18:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=148568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (3) TMI 338 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111552</link>
      <description>The court approved the scheme of reconstruction, arrangement, and demerger between the transferor and transferee companies under sections 391(2) and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The court addressed objections raised, clarified procedural aspects, and confirmed that modifications to the scheme were technical and did not alter the original intent significantly. Sanction was granted, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=111552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>